Panduan Lengkap IELTS Writing Task 2 Opinion Questions untuk Skor Tinggi

Bagian

Panjang

Komponen Utama

Fungsi

Tips Penting

Introduction

40-50 kata

• Parafrase pertanyaan.

• Pernyataan tesis (thesis statement) yang jelas

• Outline statement (opsional)

Memperkenalkan topik dan menyatakan posisi Anda dengan tegas

Jangan menyalin soal secara langsung; gunakan sinonim dan struktur kalimat berbeda

Body Paragraph 1

80-100 kata

• Topic Sentence (kalimat topik)

• Explanation (penjelasan)

• Example (contoh konkret)

• Link (kaitan kembali, opsional)

Mengembangkan argumen pertama dengan detail yang memadai

Gunakan frasa penghubung seperti "Firstly," "One significant reason..."

Body Paragraph 2

80-100 kata

• Topic Sentence

• Explanation

• Example

• Link

Memperkuat posisi Anda dengan argumen kedua yang berbeda

Pastikan argumen kedua berbeda dari yang pertama; gunakan "Furthermore," "Additionally," "Moreover"

Conclusion

30-40 kata

• Frasa penanda kesimpulan

• Pengulangan opini dengan parafrase

• Ringkasan kedua argumen

Menutup esai dengan menegaskan kembali posisi Anda

Jangan tambahkan ide baru; gunakan frasa seperti "In conclusion," "To sum up"

Bagian 1: Parafrase Pertanyaan (Background Statement)

Tuliskan kembali soal dengan kata-kata Anda sendiri menggunakan sinonim dan struktur kalimat yang berbeda. Ini menunjukkan kemampuan bahasa Anda kepada penguji dan memperkenalkan topik dengan cara yang natural.

Contoh Parafrase:

• Soal: "Some people believe that technology has made children less creative."

• Parafrase: "It is argued by certain individuals that technological advancement has diminished the creative abilities of young people.” (Dikemukakan oleh sejumlah individu bahwa kemajuan teknologi telah mengurangi kemampuan kreatif anak muda.)

Bagian 2: Thesis Statement (Pernyataan Tesis)

Nyatakan posisi Anda dengan jelas dan tegas. Ini adalah kalimat paling penting dalam introduction Anda. Gunakan frasa seperti:

• "I completely agree that..." (Saya sepenuhnya setuju bahwa...)

• "I strongly disagree with this view because..." (Saya sangat tidak setuju dengan pandangan ini karena...)

• "While I accept that..., I believe that..." (Meskipun saya menerima bahwa..., saya yakin bahwa...)

Bagian 3: Outline Statement (Pernyataan Garis Besar) - Opsional

Sebutkan secara singkat dua argumen utama yang akan Anda kembangkan dalam body paragraphs. Ini membantu penguji memahami struktur esai Anda sejak awal dan meningkatkan skor Coherence and Cohesion.

It is argued by certain individuals that technological advancement has diminished the creative abilities of young people compared to previous generations. I completely disagree with this perspective because technology actually provides diverse tools and platforms that enhance children's creativity. This essay will explore how digital resources democratize creative expression and facilitate collaborative learning.

(Dikemukakan oleh sejumlah individu bahwa kemajuan teknologi telah mengurangi kemampuan kreatif anak muda dibandingkan generasi sebelumnya. Saya sama sekali tidak setuju dengan perspektif ini karena teknologi justru menyediakan beragam alat dan platform yang meningkatkan kreativitas anak-anak. Esai ini akan mengeksplorasi bagaimana sumber daya digital mendemokratisasi ekspresi kreatif dan memfasilitasi pembelajaran kolaboratif.)

Topic Sentence (Kalimat Topik)

Kalimat pertama yang menyatakan argumen utama paragraf. Harus jelas, spesifik, dan langsung mendukung thesis statement Anda.

Frasa Pembuka yang Efektif:

• "Firstly, one significant reason is..." (Pertama, satu alasan penting adalah...)

• "The primary argument in favour of this view is..." (Argumen utama yang mendukung pandangan ini adalah...)

• "To begin with, it is important to consider..." (Untuk memulai, penting untuk mempertimbangkan...)

Explanation (Penjelasan)

Dua hingga tiga kalimat yang menjelaskan mengapa atau bagaimana argumen Anda valid. Ini adalah tempat Anda mengembangkan logika dan menunjukkan pemikiran kritis.

Example (Contoh)

Satu hingga dua kalimat yang memberikan contoh konkret, data, atau ilustrasi spesifik yang mendukung argumen Anda. Contoh harus realistis dan relevan.

Link (Kalimat Penghubung) - Opsional

Kalimat penutup yang menghubungkan kembali argumen paragraf dengan thesis statement atau mempersiapkan transisi ke paragraf berikutnya.

Tahap

Waktu

Kegiatan

Perencanaan

5 menit

Membaca soal, analisis pertanyaan, brainstorming ide, membuat outline singkat

Penulisan Introduction

7 menit

Menulis parafrase, thesis statement, dan outline statement

Body Paragraph 1

11 menit

Menulis topic sentence, explanation, example, dan link

Body Paragraph 2

11 menit

Menulis topic sentence, explanation, example, dan link

Conclusion

4 menit

Menulis frasa penanda, parafrase opini, dan ringkasan

Editing & Proofreading

2 menit

Memeriksa kesalahan tata bahasa, ejaan, dan memastikan menjawab semua aspek soal

Contoh Soal 1: "Some people believe that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?" (Beberapa orang percaya bahwa teknologi telah membuat anak-anak menjadi kurang kreatif dibandingkan masa lalu. Sejauh mana Anda setuju atau tidak setuju?)

Analisis Lengkap:

• Topik Utama: Pengaruh teknologi terhadap kreativitas anak-anak

• Kata Kunci: "technology" (teknologi), "children" (anak-anak), "less creative" (kurang kreatif), "in the past" (di masa lalu)

• Tugas: Menyatakan seberapa jauh Anda setuju atau tidak setuju dengan pernyataan

• Jenis Soal: Opinion Essay - "To what extent do you agree or disagree?" menunjukkan ini adalah IELTS Writing Task 2 agree or disagree

Contoh Soal 2: "Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. What is your opinion?" (Ilmuwan dan ahli teknologi tampaknya lebih dihargai oleh masyarakat modern dibandingkan musisi dan seniman. Apa pendapat Anda?)

Analisis Lengkap:

• Topik Utama: Perbandingan penghargaan masyarakat terhadap profesi sains-teknologi vs seni-musik

• Kata Kunci: "scientists" (ilmuwan), "technology experts" (ahli teknologi), "more valued" (lebih dihargai), "musicians" (musisi), "artists" (seniman), "modern society" (masyarakat modern)

• Tugas: Memberikan pendapat tentang perbandingan penghargaan terhadap dua kelompok profesi

• Jenis Soal: Opinion Essay - "What is your opinion?" menunjukkan ini adalah IELTS Writing Task 2 what is your opinion

Setuju (Technology reduces creativity)

Tidak Setuju (Technology enhances creativity)

Anak-anak hanya meniru konten online

Teknologi menyediakan alat kreatif baru (aplikasi desain, video editing)

Lebih banyak waktu di layar, kurang bermain fisik

Akses ke tutorial dan pembelajaran kreatif online

Kurang imajinasi karena semua tersedia

Kolaborasi global dengan kreator lain

Bergantung pada template/preset

Platform untuk berbagi karya kreatif

Pilih "Completely Agree" atau "Completely Disagree" jika

Pilih "Partially Agree" jika

• Anda memiliki dua argumen kuat yang mendukung satu sisi

• Anda dapat dengan mudah memikirkan contoh spesifik untuk setiap argumen

• Anda menargetkan IELTS Band 6.5-7.5

• Anda ingin struktur esai yang lebih sederhana dan aman

• Kedua sisi argumen memiliki poin valid yang ingin Anda bahas

• Anda sangat percaya diri dengan kemampuan menulis Anda

• Anda menargetkan IELTS Band 8.0+

• Anda dapat menyeimbangkan kedua sisi tanpa membuat esai terlihat ambigu

Mengubah Struktur Kalimat

Ubah susunan kalimat dari aktif ke pasif, atau sebaliknya, sambil mempertahankan makna yang sama.

Contoh:

• Asli: "Some people believe that technology has made children less creative."

• Parafrase: "It is argued by certain individuals that technological advancement has diminished the creative abilities of young people."

Mengubah Word Class (Kelas Kata)

Ubah kata benda menjadi kata kerja, atau kata sifat menjadi kata benda, untuk variasi.

Contoh:

• Asli: "...has made children less creative" (kata sifat)

• Parafrase: "...has reduced children's creativity" (kata benda)

Soal Asli: "Some people believe that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past." (Beberapa orang percaya bahwa teknologi telah membuat anak-anak menjadi kurang kreatif dibandingkan masa lalu.)

Parafrase Versi A - Menggunakan Sinonim: "Certain individuals argue that technological advancement has diminished the imaginative abilities of youngsters compared to previous generations." (Individu tertentu berpendapat bahwa kemajuan teknologi telah mengurangi kemampuan imajinatif anak muda dibandingkan generasi sebelumnya.)

Parafrase Versi B - Mengubah Struktur: "It is claimed that the creativity of today's youth has declined as a result of increasing reliance on modern technology." (Diklaim bahwa kreativitas pemuda saat ini telah menurun sebagai akibat dari ketergantungan yang meningkat pada teknologi modern.)

Berpihak Sepenuhnya

Gunakan pendekatan ini ketika Anda sepenuhnya setuju atau tidak setuju dengan pernyataan. Ini adalah pilihan yang lebih aman dan direkomendasikan untuk mayoritas peserta tes.

Frasa untuk Strong Agreement (Setuju Sepenuhnya):

• "I completely agree that..." (Saya sepenuhnya setuju bahwa...)

• "I strongly believe that..." (Saya sangat yakin bahwa...)

• "This essay fully supports the view that..." (Esai ini sepenuhnya mendukung pandangan bahwa...)

• "I am entirely convinced that..." (Saya sepenuhnya yakin bahwa...)

Contoh: "I completely agree that technology has reduced children's creativity because digital devices discourage original thinking and limit physical exploration." (Saya sepenuhnya setuju bahwa teknologi telah mengurangi kreativitas anak-anak karena perangkat digital menghambat pemikiran orisinal dan membatasi eksplorasi fisik.

Frasa untuk Strong Disagreement (Tidak Setuju Sepenuhnya):

• "I completely disagree with this view because..." (Saya sama sekali tidak setuju dengan pandangan ini karena...)

• "I strongly disagree with the notion that..." (Saya sangat tidak setuju dengan gagasan bahwa...)

• "This essay firmly opposes the idea that..." (Esai ini tegas menentang ide bahwa...)

• "I cannot accept the claim that..." (Saya tidak dapat menerima klaim bahwa...)

Contoh: "I completely disagree with this perspective because technology actually provides diverse tools and platforms that enhance children's creativity and enable them to express their imagination in innovative ways." (Saya sama sekali tidak setuju dengan perspektif ini karena teknologi justru menyediakan beragam alat dan platform yang meningkatkan kreativitas anak-anak dan memungkinkan mereka mengekspresikan imajinasi dengan cara-cara inovatif.)

Balanced Opinion (Setuju Sebagian)

Gunakan pendekatan ini hanya jika Anda sangat percaya diri dengan kemampuan menulis dan menargetkan Band 8.0+.

Frasa untuk Balanced Opinion:

• "While I accept that..., I believe that..." (Meskipun saya menerima bahwa..., saya yakin bahwa...)

• "Although there is some truth to..., I would argue that..." (Meskipun ada benarnya..., saya akan berpendapat bahwa...)

• "I partly agree with this statement because... However, I also believe that..." (Saya sebagian setuju dengan pernyataan ini karena... Namun, saya juga yakin bahwa...)

Contoh: "While I accept that excessive screen time can limit certain traditional forms of creative play, I believe that technology fundamentally enhances children's creative potential by providing unprecedented access to creative tools and global inspiration." (Meskipun saya menerima bahwa waktu layar yang berlebihan dapat membatasi bentuk-bentuk tertentu dari permainan kreatif tradisional, saya yakin bahwa teknologi secara fundamental meningkatkan potensi kreatif anak-anak dengan memberikan akses yang belum pernah ada sebelumnya ke alat-alat kreatif dan inspirasi global.)

Contoh

Soal

Introduction

Strong Disagreement (Tidak Setuju Sepenuhnya)

Some people believe that technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued by certain individuals that technological advancement has diminished the creative abilities of young people compared to previous generations. I completely disagree with this perspective because technology actually provides diverse tools and platforms that enhance children's creativity. This essay will explore how digital resources democratize creative expression and facilitate collaborative learning among children worldwide.

(Dikemukakan oleh sejumlah individu bahwa kemajuan teknologi telah mengurangi kemampuan kreatif anak muda dibandingkan generasi sebelumnya. Saya sama sekali tidak setuju dengan perspektif ini karena teknologi justru menyediakan beragam alat dan platform yang meningkatkan kreativitas anak-anak. Esai ini akan mengeksplorasi bagaimana sumber daya digital mendemokratisasi ekspresi kreatif dan memfasilitasi pembelajaran kolaboratif di antara anak-anak di seluruh dunia.)

Strong Agreement (Setuju Sepenuhnya)

A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?

It is often claimed that earning a high income holds greater significance than finding fulfillment in one's work. I strongly disagree with this statement because job satisfaction leads to better mental health and overall quality of life, while high-paying positions often come with excessive stress that can be detrimental to well-being.

(Sering diklaim bahwa mendapatkan penghasilan tinggi memiliki signifikansi yang lebih besar daripada menemukan kepuasan dalam pekerjaan seseorang. Saya sangat tidak setuju dengan pernyataan ini karena kepuasan kerja menghasilkan kesehatan mental yang lebih baik dan kualitas hidup secara keseluruhan, sementara posisi dengan gaji tinggi sering kali datang dengan stres berlebihan yang dapat merugikan kesejahteraan.)

Balanced Opinion (Setuju Sebagian)

Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. What is your opinion?

In contemporary society, professionals working in science and technology fields appear to receive greater recognition than those pursuing careers in the arts and music. While I accept that technological innovation drives economic growth and thus receives more public attention, I believe that artists and musicians provide equally essential contributions to society by enriching cultural life and promoting human expression.

(Dalam masyarakat kontemporer, para profesional yang bekerja di bidang sains dan teknologi tampaknya menerima pengakuan yang lebih besar daripada mereka yang mengejar karier di bidang seni dan musik. Meskipun saya menerima bahwa inovasi teknologi mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi dan dengan demikian menerima lebih banyak perhatian publik, saya yakin bahwa seniman dan musisi memberikan kontribusi yang sama pentingnya bagi masyarakat dengan memperkaya kehidupan budaya dan mempromosikan ekspresi manusia.

Firstly, modern technology offers children access to creative software and digital platforms that were unavailable to previous generations. Design applications, video editing programs, and digital art tools enable young people to experiment with various forms of artistic expression without requiring expensive materials or formal training. For instance, Indonesian children can now create animated videos using free applications like Kinemaster or design digital artwork on tablets, skills that enhance their creative thinking and technical abilities simultaneously. These technological resources democratize creativity by making creative tools accessible to children from diverse economic backgrounds.

(Pertama, teknologi modern menawarkan anak-anak akses ke perangkat lunak kreatif dan platform digital yang tidak tersedia bagi generasi sebelumnya. Aplikasi desain, program pengeditan video, dan alat seni digital memungkinkan anak muda bereksperimen dengan berbagai bentuk ekspresi artistik tanpa memerlukan bahan mahal atau pelatihan formal. Misalnya, anak-anak Indonesia sekarang dapat membuat video animasi menggunakan aplikasi gratis seperti Kinemaster atau mendesain karya seni digital di tablet, keterampilan yang meningkatkan pemikiran kreatif dan kemampuan teknis mereka secara bersamaan. Sumber daya teknologi ini mendemokratisasi kreativitas dengan membuat alat kreatif dapat diakses oleh anak-anak dari latar belakang ekonomi yang beragam.)

In conclusion, I firmly believe that technology enhances rather than diminishes children's creativity. The availability of diverse digital tools and the opportunity for global collaboration provide young people with unprecedented resources to develop and express their creative potential. Rather than limiting creativity, technology serves as a powerful catalyst for innovative thinking among modern children.

(Kesimpulannya, saya sangat yakin bahwa teknologi meningkatkan, bukan mengurangi, kreativitas anak-anak. Ketersediaan beragam alat digital dan kesempatan untuk berkolaborasi secara global memberikan anak muda sumber daya yang belum pernah ada sebelumnya untuk mengembangkan dan mengekspresikan potensi kreatif mereka. Alih-alih membatasi kreativitas, teknologi berfungsi sebagai katalis yang kuat untuk pemikiran inovatif di kalangan anak-anak modern.)

Aspek

Strong Opinion

Balanced Opinion

Kapan Digunakan

Ketika Anda memiliki keyakinan kuat pada satu sisi, atau ketika soal meminta pendapat yang jelas

Ketika topik memiliki nuansa dan kedua sisi memiliki argumen valid, atau ketika Anda ingin menunjukkan pemikiran kritis tingkat tinggi

Tingkat Kesulitan

Lebih mudah - fokus pada satu sisi

Lebih sulit - harus menyeimbangkan dua perspektif

Target Band

Cocok untuk Band 6.5-7.5

Cocok untuk Band 8.0+

Kelebihan

Argumen lebih jelas dan koheren; lebih aman untuk mayoritas peserta; lebih mudah dikelola dalam waktu terbatas

Menunjukkan kemampuan berpikir kritis yang lebih tinggi; mencerminkan pemahaman yang lebih dalam tentang kompleksitas isu

Kekurangan

Mungkin terlihat kurang nuansir untuk topik yang kompleks

Risiko membuat esai terlihat ambigu atau tidak konsisten jika tidak dieksekusi dengan baik; membutuhkan waktu perencanaan lebih lama

Rekomendasi

Direkomendasikan untuk sebagian besar peserta tes

Hanya untuk peserta yang sangat percaya diri dengan kemampuan menulis mereka

Some people believe that governments should invest more money in public transportation systems rather than improving roads for private vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is argued that governments should allocate greater financial resources to developing public transportation infrastructure rather than enhancing road networks for personal cars. I strongly agree with this perspective because prioritizing public transport significantly reduces environmental pollution and alleviates urban traffic congestion more effectively than expanding road capacity.

Firstly, investing in comprehensive public transportation systems dramatically decreases carbon emissions and air pollution in cities. When governments provide efficient, affordable, and accessible public transit options such as metro systems, bus rapid transit corridors, and electric trains, citizens are more likely to abandon private vehicle use for daily commuting. For instance, Jakarta's Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system, launched in 2019, has encouraged thousands of commuters to switch from personal motorcycles and cars to electric trains, resulting in measurably lower pollution levels in areas served by the MRT network. This environmental benefit extends beyond individual cities, contributing to global efforts to combat climate change and improve public health.

Furthermore, expanding public transportation infrastructure addresses the root cause of traffic congestion more sustainably than building additional roads. Research consistently demonstrates that constructing new roads simply induces more demand for car travel, a phenomenon known as induced demand, which eventually leads to the same level of congestion despite increased road capacity. In contrast, well-designed public transit systems can move significantly more people per hour than private vehicles, maximizing the efficient use of urban space. Singapore's integrated transport network exemplifies this approach, where heavy investment in metro lines and bus services has maintained relatively smooth traffic flow despite the city-state's high population density and economic prosperity.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that government funding should prioritize public transportation development over road improvement projects. The substantial environmental benefits and more effective congestion management provided by robust public transit systems make them a superior investment for creating sustainable, livable cities that benefit all citizens equally.

Some people believe that online learning will completely replace traditional classroom education in the future. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is often contended that the rise of digital technology will lead to online learning entirely supplanting conventional face-to-face education. While I acknowledge the significant benefits of online platforms, I strongly disagree with the assertion that they will completely replace traditional classrooms. This is because traditional schooling provides irreplaceable social development and essential hands-on learning experiences that are fundamental to a holistic education.

Firstly, traditional classrooms are crucial environments for fostering essential social and interpersonal skills. Direct interaction with peers and teachers allows students to learn collaboration, negotiation, and non-verbal communication cues in a way that virtual environments cannot fully replicate. They learn to debate ideas respectfully, resolve conflicts, and work as a team towards a common goal. For example, a group science project in a physical laboratory requires students to coordinate tasks, share equipment, and build consensus in real-time, nurturing teamwork and communication skills that are vital for future employment and personal relationships. These nuanced social dynamics are largely absent in the structured and often text-based interactions of online courses.

Furthermore, a vast number of academic and vocational subjects fundamentally depend on practical, hands-on engagement that is impossible to deliver effectively through a screen. Fields such as medicine, engineering, chemistry, and the creative arts require physical laboratories, workshops, and studios where students can apply theoretical knowledge. A medical student, for instance, cannot learn surgical techniques solely from simulations; they require the tactile experience of working on anatomical models under the direct, physical supervision of an experienced professor. Similarly, an artist needs a studio to work with materials, and an engineer needs a workshop to build prototypes. These essential practical components of education cannot be substituted by virtual reality or online tutorials.

In conclusion, while online learning is an invaluable tool that offers flexibility and access to information, I firmly maintain that it will not and should not completely replace traditional classroom education. The development of crucial social skills through face-to-face interaction and the necessity of hands-on learning for many disciplines ensure that physical schools and universities will remain an indispensable cornerstone of education for the foreseeable future.

Some people argue that celebrities should not be considered role models for young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is widely debated whether public figures, particularly those in the entertainment and sports industries, serve as appropriate role models for the younger generation. While I understand that some celebrities exhibit questionable behavior, I largely disagree with the notion that they should be dismissed as role models entirely. This is because many celebrities inspire positive change and demonstrate admirable qualities such as perseverance and dedication.

On the one hand, the argument that celebrities can be poor role models holds some validity. The media frequently publicizes the scandalous lives of famous individuals, including issues like substance abuse, lavish materialism, and a disregard for the law. For instance, a young fan might mistakenly believe that a wealthy lifestyle justifies reckless spending or that fame excuses irresponsible behavior, potentially leading them to adopt negative values and habits. This constant exposure to a glorified yet often problematic lifestyle can certainly have a detrimental impact on impressionable young minds.

On the other hand, many celebrities use their platform to champion important social causes and exemplify remarkable personal qualities. Numerous public figures are actively involved in philanthropy, environmental activism, and advocating for mental health awareness, motivating young people to become more socially conscious. Furthermore, the journey to success for many celebrities is often a story of immense hard work, discipline, and resilience in the face of failure. For example, an aspiring athlete who looks up to a sports icon is not just admiring their fame, but also their years of rigorous training and unwavering commitment. This can instill a powerful work ethic and the determination to pursue their own ambitions.

In conclusion, while it is true that the behavior of some celebrities can set a negative example, I firmly believe that their potential to inspire and motivate outweighs these concerns. The key lies in guiding young people to admire celebrities for their positive contributions and commendable qualities, such as dedication and social responsibility, rather than their fame or fortune. Therefore, celebrities can and should be considered valuable role models.

Fungsi

Contoh Frasa dan Penggunaannya

Menyatakan Opini Kuat

• I firmly believe that…

• I strongly agree/disagree with the view that…

• In my opinion, it is clear that…

• From my perspective, there is no doubt that…

• I am convinced that...

Menyatakan Opini Seimbang

• While I accept that..., I believe that…

• Although there is some truth to..., I would argue that…

• To a certain extent, I agree that..., however…

• I partly agree with this statement because...

Memperkenalkan Argumen

• Firstly/First and foremost/To begin with…

• One significant reason is…

• The primary argument in favor of... is…

• Additionally/Furthermore/Moreover…

• Another important consideration is...

Memberikan Penjelasan

• This is because…

• The reason for this is…

• This can be attributed to…

• As a result of this…

• Consequently/Therefore/Thus...

Memberikan Contoh

• For instance/For example…

• A clear example of this is…

• This is evident in…

• To illustrate this point…

• A case in point is…

• This can be seen in...

Menyatakan Kontras

• However/Nevertheless/Nonetheless…

• On the other hand…

• In contrast/By contrast…

• Despite this/In spite of this…

• Although/While...

Menekankan Poin

• It is particularly important to note that…

• Significantly/Notably/Remarkably…

• What is more important is…

• It should be emphasized that…

• Indeed/Certainly...

Menyimpulkan

• In conclusion/To conclude…

• To sum up/In summary…

• Overall/All things considered…

• Taking everything into account…

• In the final analysis...